Originally Posted by
Xray678
The loss of wide body flying and more stagnation from another age change are much bigger threats to my career than more 76 seat jets that they will have trouble staffing anyway.
You really think they would be asking if they couldn't staff them? Especially when how its written would probably replace more smaller "RJs" for fewer "larger RJ's" thus alleviating their staffing problem, at least to some degree? You really think this is a way to extract value from their stupidity and roll it into payrates or whatever?