I know I am going to regret this, but:
Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
I think it's pretty clear now why the company paid out ~half of the PS several months early last year.
That's an interesting theory, but nothing more.
Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
They were prepping the battlefield, and wanted to remove the psychological boost of one large profit sharing check immediately prior to Section 6 openers. They were trying to acclimate us to getting less on Feb 14.
Again, an interesting theory and since it fits your agenda it can't be anything BUT the truth.
Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
Sambo nailed it. PS completely negates the "TVM" of another rushed deal.
Not really, and while we are here, define "rushed".
Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
Let's wind the clock.
How long is an appropriate length of time?