Originally Posted by
UGBSM
Well I don't disagree with any of that really, gloopy. I don't give credence to any rumors are out there, so if they include deep concessions that puzzles me.
I think it is reasonable to expect a good contract ahead, with plenty of gains all around. I don't see the rationale at all for going backwards on any part of our contract considering the current economic and pattern bargaining environment.
Im just saying I'd take double and triples rather than holding out for the dubious home run. That seems reasonable. RBIs score the same as homers.
TVM may make sense within reason, while there is no need for concessions, especially big foundational concessions on scope, sick leave, work rules and "productivity".
Huzzah!