Originally Posted by
Cujo665
Using contractual requirements as the basis for the math, and what past performance of it has been is going to be the same regardless of who does the math.
The same was essentially said of Letter 3 on September 10, 2001. One needs to truly examine the foundation of the "math" to grasp its validity.
*see my previous two points about why Envoy can make these claims regarding the past flow numbers. The foundation is THEY HAD TO FLOW THESE PILOTS. Once the legal 824 are gone, different dynamics take over and the "6-year" projection (look up that term) is simply that.
A projection based on hypothetical that have YET to be anchored with commitments. UNLESS and UNTIL AAG (NOT Envoy) makes the necessary commitments, that's ALL that will ever be offered;
Projections.