Originally Posted by
gloopy
I'm sure there's some no talent hack B-school ladder climbers that would like to ink billion dollar extentions for 50 seat lift because the flash in the pan actuarials make it seem more palatable with cheaper oil. Monetize the temporary Saudi assault on US oil production into a long term renewal of a failed business model, bonuses all around baybee!
I can only imagine what we will have to give up to prevent this.

Or worse, what we will "gain" to allow it.
Why did management want to keep 100-125 50 seaters when they announced RJ reductions in 2012? Could it be that at $100 oil they still returned 15%?