Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Nothing theoretical about it Sink r8. What you and Prodessor, and slowplay and Sailingfun and rube, etc are so concerned about is that decision might be made without your side completely controlling the message.
My point exactly. Thanks for illustrating the way in which some posters line up here: sides. Not ideas, sides. I couldn't think of anyone better suited to demonstrate this antiquated, monochromatic, fratricide stuff, so thank you.
The past has been a long series of... that crap, with two identifiable groups slugging it out, and the rest of us along for the ride. The JCBA, the SLI, the Compass vote, C2012, the DPA, the recall, the 117 TA, this, it's all been different battlegrounds for the same war. The tactics haven't even changed. You could rewind the L&G back to 2012, and plug about 150 pages right in this thing. It's predictable that any college-bound kid could predict the next communications from any given council.
And it hasn't done any good.
Moving forward, I think we have to unite around ideas that work, strategies that work, and decide on results. This pre-supposes 1) respect for the process, and 2) the right of the Delta pilots to decide for themselves based on actual language. That's the side I think we should all be on.