View Single Post
Old 05-31-2015 | 03:13 PM
  #5273  
notEnuf's Avatar
notEnuf
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 820
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Sailing,

I refer you to post 5225. It's back a few pages. I posted that to flush out the 37% number because I didn't have a document citing it. Without that my claim would be unsubstantiated. The logic is correct. I have already shown the 2015 first two quarters profit sharing are trending well above 2014. (it's back a little further)

The 4.5 number was used to lowball the PTIX assuming reduction in total profit sharing when the other employee groups get cut. And it's a good red herring because that is a well known number.

28.8 was my number. I will concede yours 20+%. I think we are roughly in agreement. I still welcome your scrutiny.

Last edited by notEnuf; 05-31-2015 at 03:25 PM.
Reply