Originally Posted by
Typhoonpilot
•The Big 3 are using the Gulf carriers’ modest market incursions to create a boogey man against which they can rail publicly as a way of distracting the public from the big – though still not remarkable on a net margin basis – profits the U.S. carriers finally are earning.
•The fight against the Gulf carriers is a way to rally U.S. airline labor groups in support a management that’s seeking to protect U.S. jobs, thereby making it difficult for labor to fight management for big raises and increases in benefits now that the airlines are making decent money.
Question: why aren't these 2 explanatory motives entirely plausible? Deflection/distraction are a BIG part of how "leadership" works these days, in DC and elsewhere.
Plausible? Yes, in some ways each theory is. But none of those theories is entirely satisfying, either.
Taken together they would seem to explain quite a bit.