Originally Posted by
gloopy
Nope. Was before may or may not ever be again. If I am this won't effect me anyway. That's not relevant though. Covering that much real estate/traffic/expense is completely unreasonable even if the majority of the base wasn't commuters, which it is and always will be. JFK/LGA isn't nearly as bad but EWR should be either a separate domicile or just another overnighting city. Blending all 3 is a major long standing concession.
It's a pain. I agree.
The categories I have been based on up there EWR was typically covered by the N. PA dudes. So it worked out. I really think a reasonable thing is to have ground trans paid for by the company.
Which it kinda is. We have space a on the crew runner. Anyway. I agree EWR kinda isn't sorta all that really if you think about it hard and deeply all things considered very good.
But the la airports are way way worse.