Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Just to be clear, if this grievance settlement does NOT include an agreement to get back above the JV minimum and a timeline to do so, that represents a permanent reset of our scope. If the company decides to stay in violation again, we grieve it again and they pay us again. That's the new legal precedent. The only way that's not the case is if this grievance settlement includes a remedy and timeline. If there was, the MEC administration would have said so. They didn't. That's why I'm quite certain there is no such remedy or timeline.
We shall see.
Carl
I understand your position, I just disagree with your premise. Absent a vote by the MEC or a new PWA, section one remains intact.
I do understand your point, though.
It is my hope that the TA contains stronger language re: JVs.