Originally Posted by
D Mantooth
I understand your position, I just disagree with your premise. Absent a vote by the MEC or a new PWA, section one remains intact.
I do understand your point, though.
It is my hope that the TA contains stronger language re: JVs.
That's just not true. If this settlement agreement doesn't state a remedy and timeline for cure, our scope has been re-written. Then we'll be down to hoping that TA2015 re-cures it with new language that is actually defensible without grievance.
Carl