Originally Posted by
Going2Baja
That was my reason for voting 2012 as a No. Once we open the door it's hard to shut. Here we are now, 4 years later, and they are asking for more RJ's. I'm VERY surprised that aren't asking for E-190's and dangling that carrot. I'm fine w/ 190's as long as WE are flying them.
Baja.
AA and CAL used to own all flying over 50-seats.
UAL owned all flying over 70 seats and they were not unlimited as per the DALPA sales job of C12, they were tied to block hours and referred to as jumbo RJs.
DL was the first to break the 90-seater loose on the scale it is today. And we are going to do it AGAIN for C15.
Everyone needs to read Section 1. SEA is NOT a hub and never will be if that section doesn't get changed. LAX is exempted from hub to hub flying wrt the Alaska marketing agreement.
If you are SEA, LAX, SLC or MSP section 1 should be a no-go for you. I realized gains from the movement in SEA and LAX all the way on the other coast. I went from barely a NB line holder to solid intl line holder bc of that growth. So yes, EVERYONE should care about scope.
And when has the company not pushed the limits or blatantly violated the contract? Trust should be out the door.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk