Originally Posted by
shiznit
Sure. Get angry, I hope it makes you feel better. UAL and AAL pilots have been "angry" for a long time and they've pretty much proven that the C-suite or shareholders GAS. Labor risk will not be on the table in any meaningful way, and it'd be illegal without help from the NMB.
Got any good examples of the modern NMB allowing "labor risk"?
What did they do to get that ability?
How long did it take?
Was their company offering a positive or negative agreement?
Was that company profitable at the time?
I'm all for another "strategy", but I want to see a version that has shown the ability to increase a pay table by nearly 50% in the last 9 years (plus many other significant increases in contract value).
Who knows how much more we might get with this TA, we will see on Tuesday. In the meantime:
STOP THE FREAK OUT
If Richard believes half of what he says about the important role pilots play in customer satisfaction, it won't take illegal action to quickly erode the premium Delta can charge at the moment. Stock price would quickly follow. NMB isn't going to monitor when the captain starts his engines, how much effort he puts into an efficient descent profile, how many pizza parties he orchestrates during IROPs, his comments and attention to Diamond Medallions, the frequency and quality of passenger updates during delays, nor the degree to which he panders to the FAs so they, in turn, treat passengers that much better. The list obviously goes on longer. Winning JD Power won't be possible without supportive employees on the flight deck. Richard knows the value of a constructive relationship with our union among so many other non-unionized employees. If this TA stinks and it actually gets kicked back (before or after a MEMRAT attempt), I suspect they'll come to Jesus in a hurry to keep the wheels from shaking off the bus.