Originally Posted by
SharpestTool
I would love to follow that footprint. But, that was a 100% unified MEC and the results showed. Arguably it was the best contract ever. I voted NO because of the scope. It sucked big time, but the pay was outstanding. Our MEC is nowhere as unified and is more or less split down the middle. Council 1 and 20 are certainly not happy with the MEC and they have chosen to make that fact public. This isn't lost on the company negotiating team and RA.
Well then you are more of a radical than I am!
. And it was unified because of POS96. Do we need to have another POS96 before we can be unified? I sure hope not. I can't believe I'm saying this but, maybe we DO need to make changes to the MEC.
I'm all for proactive engagement when it works both ways. It's win/win. When Tuesday rolls around we will see the current results of "proactive engagement" and judge for ourselves if it's still a win/win.
Frankly, I might be coming around to the idea of letting this go to a membership vote because if I'M feeling this way about all the rumors floating around, I'll bet it doesn't pass by at least a 60/40 No majority.
Again, I have not decided yet because I have no facts.
Denny