Originally Posted by
D Mantooth
George, please keep in mind that those don't include Alitalia, and they do include our UK flying which wouldn't be counted under the TA. The block hour ratio today is considerably different.
Alitalia served the Transatlantic with 777 and 330s so their percentage of EASKs would have produced a larger block hour requirement on the Delta side had Delta honored the 50% EASK share.
The Block hour ratio is significantly different because Delta didn't feel obligated to honor a written contract...
LHR was always part of the Transatlantic JV, heck AirFrance flew LAX LHR for a while...
The DALPA briefing for the inclusion of Alitalia clearly stated that the change from 47.3% to 50% would add 6 round-trip flights (after we're done with the mod lines, LOL)
Ask yourself:
Is it a "win" if we agree to a lesser amount (50%) than actual (51.5%) when the starting point already is below written contractual language and subject to a closed grievance?
Why should we back out the VSJV numbers? Thats not how the contract is written is it? And if there is a change, what is the quid-pro-quo for that?
Shouldn't the baseline starting point be our current contract with a 50% EASK share, then calculating the aircraft block-hours based on that, before backing out the VSJV numbers?
Or does the settlement for this years' cure period compliance look-back make it all good?
Cheers
George