View Single Post
Old 06-09-2015 | 02:56 PM
  #6837  
Ferd149's Avatar
Ferd149
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Ferd,

I'll give you all of that. I shared your underwhelming sentiment when the details first started leaking out. I still have some large concerns...most notably:

- 23G5; I want more clarification on this. From my perspective this is the biggest negative of the entire deal. I DO NOT like that trips are being pulled during the PBS run.

- Sick; I want more clarification on the form 8500 issue. Other than that I don't really GAS because I don't call in sick unless I'm sick. If they want me to verify every once in awhile, so be it. The upside of an LTD bank for some of my unused time is offsets that to an extent for me.

- JV compliance; I want more clarification on the difference between EASK's and BH's. My general feeling when they were talking about it at the meeting today in detail was "that's not so bad", but I want to be able to explain it to a kindergartner before I'm totally comfy with it.

Those are the biggies for me. TLV to 81 comes with RCC language in our favor or it snaps back to 80. There are several other items that I want to explore in further detail, but after watching the whole show today it is not the horrific deal that some are painting on here. It still remains to be seen if the MEC will even send it out. More details are forthcoming, and once I saw the rationale behind the decisions I have to say I could argue it either way.

Tomorrow should be interesting. I'm not sure they will even get to a vote by the end of the day, given the pace today, but I'd rather the reps take their time and get it right.
Thanks, those are exactly my QOL concerns as well. I'm willing to listen to the JV discussion but the others just seem to be items that make you ask "Why"?

I've said on here numerous times, I'm no fan of profit sharing. However, we have it, it works and needs to be left alone at this point. If, and that's a big if, you're going to play around with it, it needs to be done outside of Section 6 for transparency. The raise should be a raise.

Speaking of the raise, the late year numbers are just disappointing to say the least.

Good to see you on here too

Ferd
Reply