Originally Posted by
Gunfighter
I saw several slides on the RJ scope, but nothing addressing the widebody concessions. This oversight by our "Strategic Planning" committee is significant cause for concern. How could a "Strategic Planning" committee overlook a reduction in top end scope? Why was there no mention of years of willful violation of the JV contract by the company? Shouldn't this enter the perspective of the NMB? Was this a really a scare tactic in disguise? (TIC)
But this is the problem, did the nc and subject matter experts and MD go rogue or did the lecs say yep, it's what we want.
It'll be interesting to hear from council 1 and 20.