Originally Posted by
forgot to bid
I think the company's goal was more of a 50%+1 passage. They saw the vote for 2012 and knew they could go even lower.
Absolutely agree from this No voter. When I started reading the pay rates, I was unimpressed but thought I shouldn't judge until I read the rest. I was shocked, like I had been kicked in the junk. My reaction was that the company thought they had gone too high in 2012. I ended up voting yes on that one with a lot of deliberation; this TA executive summary took me all of 6-9 seconds. The DALPA slide show someone posted the link to a few pages was completely FUD. MFERS!