Hermon,
I would like to thank you for your hard work regarding the TA. I realize it's a thankless job most of the time.

However, I disagree with your vote on this TA. I will say that my views are accurately reflected by the remarks that have been posted by the Council 66 Chairman explaining his "no" vote.

It's really not about the pay/PS. Although, it is anemic. I understand RA wants to reduce the amount of PS, but I expected that to be offset with significantly better training/vacation pay. Instead, concessions like LCA trip holdback and sick leave tweaks are included.

Further, I just read the Strategic Planning file regarding our options if this is voted down. It's no plan at all. It's just another PRO stance. Not even one mention of retroactive pay as a possibility. This omission is disingenuous.

Obviously, I am not in favor of this TA.

Finally, the MEC Chairman's admonition to not turn this down because there is nothing more to gain really disappointed. Sounded like something I would expect management to say.

Regards,
Early