View Single Post
Old 06-11-2015 | 04:53 PM
  #7846  
Tummy's Avatar
Tummy
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Default

I'm new here, so I apologize if my ignorance is on display. Please feel free to explain this to me like you would explain it to a kindergartener.

Originally Posted by Professor
The Company will now be in compliance with our agreement, as demanded by the Delta pilots.

Doesn't this mean we simply redefined compliance in order to allow the company to call themselves compliant?

· If we increase Delta’s block hours by 3.57% (in order to get into EASK compliance), then Delta should have flown 53.0% (by my math there is a 3.98% reduction between “should have” under C2012’s EASK and the minimum under C2015-TA)

So, doesn't that mean this new agreement would allow management to reduce our share of the block hours by 5.7%? 53/50=.943

· The use of aircraft block hours provides better downside protection since the reduction of a single Air France A380 is roughly the available seat kilometer equivalent parking of two Delta A330s.

Doesn't this work the other way too? Now they can add a single Air France A380 and only have to add one Delta A330 instead of two? It's not only downside protection; it's also upside prevention?
Reply