Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
I saw this over on chitchat. More Easter eggs to add to the pile.
There are lots of issues with this TA, but I think this one misses the mark.
If the old language specifically mentioned mechanical, then the two parties agreed to strike it, I don't think you'd have a terrible time making a case to a mediator/arbitrator about what the change means.
Yes I think the language could be phrased better, but I have always thought that about that particular section.