View Single Post
Old 06-13-2015 | 05:58 PM
  #8564  
SharpestTool
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
i would be willing to relook without some of those issues. But, now that it's out of the MEC and out to the membership I think that ship has sailed.......

Do you agree it's too late? We MAY have had a chance to reengage if the MEC hadn't passed it. I still don't think the company would have wanted to show any union had that much power/influence.
Actually I see it the other way around. I think the only chance for improvement is through a rejected ratification. It's very risky and I don't think the money can be successfully addressed considering the path and the time required.

This is why I'm trying to ascertain the mood of the most vocal critics here. If this thing can pass with modification of largely non-money issues, perhaps there is a chance. It's risky. If the company digs in, we could pay a large price to fix those items. As long as that is considered, I'm good with someone valuing them in this manner. Value is in the eye of the beholder.
Reply