Originally Posted by
80ktsClamp
The idea isn't a bad one, but both sides tend to get a bit shrill and a lot of gray is tossed around. It's already hard enough to keep up with the site, much moreso fact check every interpretation and subsequently ban.
Tool was temporary banned by a site admin for crass language and insulting other members repeatedly. I'm keeping a sharp eye on him.
While ACL65 is still listed as a mod, he hasn't actively participated here since his election. No one can see your PMs except the sender and recipient(s) of the PM.
Understood. What I proposed could just cover info exchanged over the TA. ALPA used to provide pro/con papers. They just do pro now apparently. It's not really a fair way for the membership to get an accurate picture in a short period of time.
Whereas it's been verified ALPA is sending guys to this board to push what many feel is a one sided and oft times misleading message, it would be nice to balance the CG for better climb and cruise performance before landing.
RE ACL65, I'm no lawyer but I don't think it's a good idea for him to be listed as a moderator. Members who don't agree with his politics as an ALPA rep may take issue. If I were Internet Brands I would remove his name. Thanks for listening