Originally Posted by
pilotc90a
So the latest "Letter form the Chairman" just plopped in my email in box. Apparently "social media" is good when the MEC can use it, but not when anyone has a dissenting viewpoint. Shutting down the FB page when the TA was being discussed not make perfect sense.
It also included this little nugget:
And the Delta pilots need the opportunity to consider this agreement without being inundated with simple, yet continuous falsehoods or attack.
So I guess the roadshows will be canceled too?
Social media is a double edged sword.
Many live on these boards. The conversation usually go down one path with no dissent. Some may argue MEC comm is the same. Those are both fair assessments.
Just as a thought experiment, how valid would this board hold anyone's opinion who was a firm yes?
Would they be heard?
Would they be shunned,derided and told how stupid they were?
Would they be accused of being a DALPA plant?
Food for thought only.
The group on here claims they are being sold on a TA. I would submit that there is very little room for debate with all the screaming no.
Again, if anyone has any questions or concerns the reference TA and other materials are available on the dal.alpa.org contract pages.
Thanks.