Originally Posted by
Flightcap
To make me or any other zero-121 interested, we have to see solid reasons to think a flow is semi-permanent, not just a management plan to downsize Envoy that will become a broken promise once AA likes the size of Envoy's pilot group.
What if someone were to give you equally solid reasons that a flow is not permanent, would that make you change your mind? The only thing that is crystal clear to me is AA is not going to do anything that they feel jeopardizes their feed. They'll pick the non wholly owneds dry first if it means protecting their feed.
The truth of the matter is probably AA doesn't even know what it will do long term, from a planning perspective, airlines never look that far in to the future.