Originally Posted by
TheManager
Of course it does.
You posted this:
AA has just published new comparison pay charts for their pilots.
In case you do not trust DALPA's pay analysis.
Attached Images
AA comparison paycharts.pdf (71.7 KB, 9 views)
Helping people to understand the TA would have been something like this- first, strike out your editorial comment:
"In case you do not trust DALPA's pay analysis."
Then post something like this:
Here are some recently released charts by AMR and the APA that compare our TA pay to their pay. Our pay exceeds theirs in many areas, but pay attention to the differences on both sides of the scale as details are important. A330 pay is not on an apples to apples comparison due to the difference in bands.
Those are facts. That would have been truly "helping people understand a TA that has lots of changes (that) isn't all that easy to decipher"
So, what did you say again about confirmation and information bias???
I don't agree. My point was to show that we are trying and put out third party info. Separate and apart from delta.
You are extrapolating a lot from a benign post about numbers. That is rhetorical and biased.
Not once have I ever disagreed with your point on 330 rates. Ever.
But if I were to mention anything positive in those charts, like 190 rates being by far this highest in the industry, you would have labeled me a sycophant.
I do understand your points though and will incorporate it into my communications. Thanks.