Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
OK:
By the way, the only "side" I hope you agree with tsquare is what your own mind tells you is right. In my opinion, the MEC produced explanations of the TA language is the worst choice. The actual TA language is the best choice. It's relatively straight forward and easy to understand.
Carl
So then the P2P guys that were paid to attend the meetings now invalidates their entire ability to present information and makes all of their input biased? Seriously? I am guessing any alternative representational body will volunteer tirelessly and forever.
I do agree with you that we should read the TA language itself. I don't agree that it is easy to understand. It is legalese, and that is not always self explanatory. Consider me the lowest common denominator if you want, but I can't necessarily understand the legal words, so I need a little help. I do not care if someone is on FPL or not as long as I get good information. I have no agenda.