View Single Post
Old 06-25-2015 | 04:57 AM
  #1179  
eaglefly
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
Oh Eaglefly.....your hate for all things Eagle-voy, is strong. The 250 went prior to 2013 by the way homie
You be dizzy, bro.

I have no idea what orifice you pulled that 250 number from. I don't hate Envoy, but I DO take issue with deliberate misinformation. Wilson's letter stated that 481 Envoy pilots flowed from January 2013, but AA didn't even start street hiring (the app window opened 10/1/13 IIRC), nor did ANY of the 824 pilots (mixed with the first class of street hires) hit AA property until 12/3/13. That means perhaps 150 or 1/3 of that number represented had nothing to do with meeting 824/new-hire quota's as those pilots were part of a different flow mechanism that was required by arbitration and there were NO street hires until that 12/3 class and virtually ALL of 2013 had nothing to do with the equation.

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
The Cuuj means well. We all got spit in the face by this flow hiccup, but he is right, we have sent a lot more pilots than so far called for.
If he means well (and if YOU mean well), why so much spin and misinformation ? It's interesting today you say the above, but a week ago, you said this; "we were lied to and AS USUAL, the flow is not working as designed" (see "100% flowthrough..." thread post #148 - 6/20/15).

You see, when you guys spread this stuff and then flip-flop like a freshly caught carp lying on the dock, what confidence can one get in ANYTHING you say ?

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
I still see a lot of PSA guys running in here and bashing envoy every chance they can. Very unbecoming.
I hear of A LOT of Envoy pilots doing the same thing here and on other forums and not just PSA, but RAH, Piedmont and even Delta (a recent incident) ! It seems the "unbecoming" dept. is well staffed at Envoy these days as well.
Reply