Originally Posted by
skipro101
Yup was thinking about that too. But hey, everyone 6 years and under were junior and anything that gives more to people senior is fair.
Wouldn't it benefit us to put the greater share of the money towards the top of the longevity scale where you will spend most of your career maxed-out, than to spend it on a transitional step you'll only be at for 12 months?
Let the people who want to be here for a career reap the benefits, not the job hoppers looking to get a type and bail for Fedelted.
I'm not negating the fact that we are underpaid at ALL years in both seats, though.