Originally Posted by
Metal Slug
Wouldn't it benefit us to put the greater share of the money towards the top of the longevity scale where you will spend most of your career maxed-out, than to spend it on a transitional step you'll only be at for 12 months?
Let the people who want to be here for a career reap the benefits, not the job hoppers looking to get a type and bail for Fedelted.
I'm not negating the fact that we are underpaid at ALL years in both seats, though.
I think where you may be missing the point is that most people would stay if it wasn't set up to only benefit those at the top. It also hurts those who have less than 12-15 years left, and we are hiring plenty of them.
Last edited by PikeAV8R; 06-25-2015 at 05:55 PM.
Reason: punctuation