Originally Posted by notEnuf

We can't force the company to get airplanes? 717, E190, E175. These are all being purchased by the company, did we have anything to do with that or was that a business decision? All we can do try to protect against other groups operating flights that generate revenue for Delta. If C2012 stays in effect large scope remains out of compliance.

The pacific language was rewritten to include Henada because they weren't operating enough at Narita. Now we are allowing them to rewrite again to be in compliance. Stop changing the metrics and redrawing the lines. Start enforcing the agreement. If C2012 stays and they don't change that's $60 a month more for everyone. The point is I want them to honor the deal or pay for non-compliance. The settlement was to small but that's what we agreed to. Why can we use only one metric?

The reason we don't have 787s today was because several metrics were written into the purchase agreement. The delivery timeline and the performance. If you want to bind a party to an action, you use multiple metrics to measure the action.