Originally Posted by
texavia
Because their agents, AKA management, entered into a contract making it so.
What are you talking about? We are not talking about our current contract or even a TA. Management paying us is not the issue here. We are talking about why it is so egregious to be paying the owners of the company before paying the hired help a bigger piece of the pie. I don't think management will renege on their obligations to pay the profit sharing that we have coming in the event of voting down the TA. Do you?