So where is the legal basis or justification for moving all AA guys up a grouping ''vis-a-vis 50%"? (Besides saying the word 'Superior' repeatedly). Why vis-a-vis 50% and not 40%, or 63.7%? Where are the charts showing that mathematically that produces the fair result. AA so very obviously pulled this out of their backsides. Do you honestly think a panel of 3 arbitrators would just say "yeah we don't need all that math stuff, moving AA guys up exactly half a grouping seems about right."