Originally Posted by
eaglefly
Well, the APA isn't swallowing anything, it would theoretically be the LAA pilots committee (AAPSIC). Of course, THEY are no obligation to swallow it either and thus could formulate an integration model that includes none or just portions of the Nic and argue from there. They supposedly had perhaps 10 models and it wouldn't surprise me if one or more assumed only a Nicolau consideration as an opposite.
The arbitrators of course, NEVER swallow anything, they only provide the medicine to be swallowed, so they can do whatever they feel is fair and equitable.
Completely and utterly incorrect.
APA as the new CBA just like usapa inherited the previous. M&B is not retroactive thus it has no standing on the east west list. I strongly suggest that you read all the transcripts and get yourself familiar with the courts order. I think you will see that the atty are already talking about not trying to find ways to get around the courts order and find themselves in contempt.
WD at AWA