View Single Post
Old 07-01-2015 | 04:07 PM
  #102  
eaglefly
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
If we're talking numbers.. You brought more pilots than actual seats for those pilots to the table.
Yes, hence the desire of the two LUS integration committees to select a methodology that include hits on LAA pilots using a "longevity" argument, i.e., it benefits LUS pilots and disadvantages LAA pilots. That was one of my points about the LUS committee(s) strategies as the LAA pilots are more vulnerable to this then East or West.

The two LUS committees didn't choose this methodology by accident and it had nothing to do with "equitable". They determined where our weaknesses were and attacked from that position.
Reply