Originally Posted by
gloopy
To that I say well done gentlemen! I accept the 1.1B in additional value as the most we can get. Settled law. Done.
I just reject the concessions. I therefore propose we return 100 million dollars to management as an act of good faith, and take only 1.0B in additional value over 3 years in the form of pay only. By definition this saves them 100M regardless, even without the concessions, because the concessions were properly costed into it. Right? Right.
They can take that 100M and spend it on executive bonuses, shareholder return, aircraft cap cost reduction, fuel, one extra gate in NYC (LOL I know right) or straight to charity. 100M for BCRF, Habitat, United Way, Kaboom playgrounds, museums, theatre, WWII Honor Flights, Toys for Tots, anything they want!
That's a face saving Win-Win if I ever saw one.
Right? What possible reason could they turn that offer down for?
Every time you post that, I think it should be the first paragraph in every negotiators notepad.
You know, fair and balanced.
"But there's a lot of bad info out there on the internet." DALPA