Not only that, but we are being told its still a net gain because they could do it right now if they wanted to without any pilot's permission.

Yet our scope isn't set up like that at all. We own everything, from the front end, until and unless its permitted. So where in our current language is this permitted? Cause I'm not seeing it.

This seems like the equivalent of adding a line saying the MEC chairman has to approve a company plan to stop providing transportation to the overnight hotels and then calling that a win because we control it through the MEC chairman.

The burden of proof for the claim that the foreign alter ego is currently allowed rests with the pro-TA movement and the MEC/reps/NC endorsing it. Until they can clearly show how current book allows this, we have no choice but to call bravo sierra.