Originally Posted by R57 relay

So it's not the responsibility of the west merger committee to be concerned about what or how former TWA pilots were/are treated, but the AAPSIC damn well better understand why former AWA guys are not in the seats that the seniority list they want use placed them. Got it.

Did you even read that before you posted? You do not bring the seats that you want to THIS merger! If we start with the Nic, LAA or east pilots will pay for that.

I understand how you feel about the third listers. I think the problem with placing them on a proposal junior to all west pilots is that the protocol agreement calls for a status quo of three lists. How do you carve out one subset of pilots and not apply your methodology to them? I don't see how the USAPA or LAA committee could do that, but it doesn't mean the panel won't.

As far as other comments about the proposals, I contend that we don't have enough information about the fairness of the proposals by looking at the raw lists. They don't show career progression as compare to your original list.