View Single Post
Old 07-09-2015 | 09:19 AM
  #32  
RonRicco's Avatar
RonRicco
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 5
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
I respectfully disagree.

Management's thirst for concessions will only increase.

Read their June monthly update.

Parking 747s, 757s, 767s, MD 88s, as well as introducing A 350s, 787s and 190s coupled with massive pilot retirements is more than they can handle.

They will be back within 12 months looking for us to take yet more concessions to solve the nightmare they created.

Jerry
Well. I guess my point is I can't speak for how all the other pilots in other bases feel about their reps. Certain ones that I have experience with, I am quite sure would not survive a recall even if their base were to have a majority vote "yes" on the TA. (Again, being given a bad choice and voting yes doesn't mean that a pilot felt represented)

I can speak for how I feel about the reps in my council.. It isn't the fact that they voted yes per SE', but a whole host of issues that would make me consider it.

They also have already proven that they think they can "make it rain" by their support of a chairman recall. I guess we are seeing how well that turned out for them.. Almost failed TA at the MEC level, a supremely divided MEC and pilot group. To think they used Roll Call to get us into this mess...
Reply