Originally Posted by
Hank Kingsley
The deals were in place, and they figured the TA would pass. So, post TA deadline, we have investment in GOL and Skymark. Money on the table, no way. There is much more to follow. Circa C2012.
Now, the rest of the story is that the MEC chair and admin were likely quite aware of these investments.
Again, does this appear that our collective interests were or were not on the forefront? This is not a witch hunt, just a question...
I do not believe that the scope modifications necessarily rose to the level of DFR because the TA was put out for a vote. However, if there is an LOA that negatively modifies section 1, it does meet the DFR litmus test.
Be very, very wary of section 1 changes. Especially those modifying big jet scope.