Originally Posted by
notEnuf
The expansion of the company will be as a result of international acquisitions and JV expansions. The current scope and JV protections must be maintained. If the company's revenue develops through other sources, we will be marginalized. Better upside protection on scope is a must not block hour/downside. This is also a reason to make international brand scope a MEMRAT item or at least a full MEC decision, not 1 man (MEC chairman.)
So you think we are protected under the current agreement. So can you explain this referenced article then?
And you OBVIOUSLY do not care is downside protection is thrown out the door. Got it. Thanks.