Originally Posted by
oldmako
Fair enough. My statement wasn't really aimed at you, but yours was a good retort. I've just really grown tired of the carping going on here and the other forum. Both are a poor indictment of where the combined group is, years after the merger. I'm trying to lower my expectations in advance for the next TA as a result. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers.
No feathers ruffled here. I just think your statement was disenguine...there was obviously no "fact basis" on the prior post and it was a blatant broad brush statement. All subjection, no objection. Lots of emotion, little fact or substance. Everyone responds to different training with different levels of succession. I tend to like learning more on my own initially and ask questions after (more like Houston). Some like more classroom instruction (ala TK). And don't even get me started on the haenious 1980s 76T CBTs they have at TK (which are actually incorrect and not updated) on certain systems. Now that is agregious...and that is definitely "fact based."