Originally Posted by
SayAlt
Meh.
Not a word of the above addresses any of the other concessions that went along with all that.
Drink the poison RA offered with the sugar he put into it?
No. Fortunately, the yea vote lost.
It doesn't address them because it is not causative. In other words, what I am talking about has nothing to do with the other shortfalls of the TA. I am strictly talking about the potential loss of those monies when the economy turns south. It's math and completely unemotional. If you insist in connecting them, that's fine, but you need to realize that we are now behind in inflation by 15 days from where we would have been, and will require even more to break even with what was on the table. That task becomes more difficult as time goes by. Again, just math.