Originally Posted by
BobZ
silos. another alpa fiasco.
let me simplify the base silo objective......'take from many, to make some more whole'
and then age 65 came along.....and 'ooops'....sorry, we f'kd up guys'. again.
had the union simply distributed on a non subjective pro-rata basis, using accrued/earned benefit as the baseline.....there could have been no argument about it.
I am not dredging up a decade-old argument, but let's get real. NO MATTER WHAT the union did, including "simply distributing" as you claim, there would have ALWAYS been a faction who complained about it.
God could craft the money distribution and there would have been complaints. It is the nature of distributing a large amount of money. Why do you think estate attorneys will never be in the unemployment line?