Originally Posted by
Doug Madsen
Since I doubt you'll see another TA for at least six months, you can compare what the ALPA guys said would happen if the recent TA was turned down, as opposed to what Team No said, and see whose predictions proved more accurate -- then going forward, you might listen to those who were right.
So far, the unofficial spokesperson for Team No (gzsg) is 0 for 2. He said we'd have another TA within 48 hours, and he said the E190s were here to stay.
JMO.
DM,
Team No said we would be screwed if we voted in the TA. Sixty-five percent of us agreed.
That's all that really matters.
Team ALPA might want to listen to us.
It's funny how you want to make gzsg the Team No spokesperson when a lot of us disagreed with his predictions.
Why don't you take hockey, Carl, Denny, Ferd's and others predictions? I bet if you answered truthfully you might find out why the TA failed so badly.
Hint: You hi lighted the stats that suited you (gzsg: 0-2) and ignored the ones that didn't (Hockey, Carl, et al.: 8-8). Figuratively, you made 80% look like 0%.
The above is why the TA failed and why the people you support shouldn't be listened to, because that's what they did, too.