Originally Posted by
scambo1
Bar,
I'm all for the E jets to be flown by us. Unfortunately, they were part of this TA...a carrot. I'm all for the carrot. But, the carrot was coupled with a stick. To eat the carrot, you got whacked by the stick.
This stick was partially a loss on the top end of scope. It doesn't take a ton of imagination to see that when you delete the growth opportunity on the big high paying stuff and replace it with lower paying smaller gauge jets (which pay significantly less than similar gauge we already fly) where the trajectory is.
I'm not certain you understand this completely because you are in the seniority band where you would fly left seat on the e jet...great!
The company is in compliance on an EASK basis with the AF/KLM/AZ JV for now. Going to a BH balance meant little (statistically nothing for the time being) and had the potential to benefit wide-body jobs going forward. I would not support a plan that cost a single job. (period, full stop)
The not-so-glamorous domestic work is ~ 78% of our flying. If that were increased by 16%, then it would drive more hiring.