Originally Posted by Purple Drank

Sleepy Ed has been quoted as saying there is "no more money" in any deal. Frankly, I'm surprised RA is letting him anywhere near this deal after his incompetence with NA15.

Anyway, the RLA requires both parties to continue to negotiate in good faith.

I'm trying to figure out how a Ed's position reflects a "good faith" position.

And if his statement is legal, then we need to deliver an equally inflammatory (and highly public) response. Why haven't we?