Originally Posted by
sublime259
So you're going to answer the question like a politician because you know you're wrong? Got it. Well, for a snapshot of today's fleet you are correct.
How about this, I'll dumb it down for you. How do you expect PDT to start up a 175 program for AAG when the next 40+90 options are already spoken for?
The reason I'm giving you such a hard time is because you talk out your @$$ and stick up for the crappy choices you made which have in turn degraded the profession. Sorry if it sounds like "buzzword bingo" to you.
Did I say anything about us starting a 175 program? So who's talking out who's ass again? Crappy choices? Piedmont pilots made the only choice they had and like most keyboard ceo's and wannabe ALPA leaders you have truly no idea of what you're talking about