Originally Posted by
Cujo665
We are entitled to 50%. The agreement says they'll send more when they can.
They are, and are just under 70% for the year.
220 was picked specifically because they didn't know what AA's hiring will be each month for the next 10 years and it gives them a small buffer in case AA classes are smaller than 40 new hires. If classes get too small... Under 220 for the year, we step up in pay above the cap.
There's tons of details people seem to ignore. You might want to go actually read it all before posting your expert analysis
I have read it. What have I said that isn't true?
The issue I brought up is you once again "carrying the company's water" by touting ad naseaum that LOOK, ENVOY HAS FLOWED 70% OF AA NEW HIRES THIS YEAR. Other than pointing out you wearing the recruiting/management mouthpiece hat, my point was not to expect 70% to continue beyond AAG directly benefiting from it. Expect a decline, hopefully to not any lower than the agreement, but this company does have a history of not giving a crap about agreements and letting arbitrators figure it out YEARS later. We are currently in the lucky position, in this instance, of our desires being aligned.