Originally Posted by
Lambourne
The MEC voted down the LOA. The reasons my reps gave for not voting yes were the number of pay claims on going. So instead of giving us more options for higher pay and to continue the operation, my LEC decided the added work was too much for the company I suppose.
There was (is) a serious problem with the company not actually paying the lower priced extensions that were
already in the UPA.
Why would anybody expect anything different with the LOA without some other changes?
Note the significant personnel changes the company made in Labor Strategy and Pilot Contract Compliance once the MEC voted down the LOA. Coincidence?